In today’s fast-moving industrial and embedded systems, storage performance plays a critical role. As data volumes grow—from sensor logs to AI models—many engineers are considering an upgrade to PCIe Gen4 SSDs. But is the jump from Gen3 to Gen4 really worth it? And what are the real-world trade-offs?
This article breaks down the key differences between PCIe Gen3 and Gen4 SSDs, focusing on actual performance, power use, compatibility, and suitability for industrial applications. We’ll help you make a practical, informed decision—based on facts, not marketing claims.
Before comparing Gen3 and Gen4, it’s important to understand what PCIe is and how it evolves.
PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express) has been the standard interface for high-speed devices like GPUs and SSDs for over a decade. Each new generation doubles the data rate per lane, enabling faster communication between the CPU and peripheral devices.
PCIe Gen4, officially released in 2017, is the successor to Gen3. The most significant change? It doubles the data transfer rate.
PCIe Gen3 runs at 8 GT/s (gigatransfers per second), delivering about 1 GB/s per lane
PCIe Gen4 runs at 16 GT/s, providing roughly 2 GB/s per lane.
For NVMe SSDs, which typically use a x4 channel configuration, this means:
Gen3 max bandwidth: ~3,940 MB/s
Gen4 max bandwidth: ~7,880 MB/s
Think of it like a highway: Gen3 is a 4-lane road, while Gen4 is an 8-lane road. More lanes mean more data can travel at once.
With double the bandwidth, you might expect Gen4 SSDs to be twice as fast. In theory, yes—but real-world results depend on the workload.
For sequential read/write tasks, such as transferring large video files or loading AI models, Gen4 SSDs clearly outperform Gen3. High-end Gen4 drives like the ADATA LEGEND 960 MAX can reach speeds over 7,000 MB/s, nearly double the top speed of most Gen3 SSDs.
However, in random I/O operations—common in industrial control, database queries, or real-time monitoring—the performance gap narrows. Many embedded applications don’t saturate the full bandwidth of Gen3, so upgrading to Gen4 offers limited benefit.
Moreover, system bottlenecks—such as CPU performance, memory bandwidth, or software latency—can limit how much speed improvement you actually experience. If your application doesn’t push data continuously, the extra bandwidth of Gen4 may go unused.
While Gen4 offers faster data transfer, it comes with trade-offs in power consumption and thermal output.
Gen4 SSDs use more power, especially under heavy load. The higher signaling frequency and advanced controllers increase energy use by 20% to 40% compared to Gen3 drives. This matters in power-sensitive environments like battery-powered devices, remote IoT gateways, or compact embedded systems.
Heat generation is another concern. Gen4 SSDs can run significantly hotter—some exceed 70°C during sustained writes. Without proper cooling, thermal throttling may reduce performance over time. Industrial users must consider thermal design: metal heatsinks, thermal pads, or airflow in enclosed cabinets.
In contrast, Gen3 SSDs run cooler and more efficiently, making them a better fit for fanless, wide-temperature, or long-term deployment scenarios.
One of the biggest advantages of PCIe Gen4 is backward compatibility.
You can install a Gen4 SSD on a Gen3 motherboard, and it will work—just at Gen3 speeds. This allows for a flexible upgrade path: deploy the SSD now, and unlock its full speed later when you upgrade your CPU and motherboard.
To fully use Gen4, your system must support it at three levels:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 3000 series or newer, Intel 11th Gen or newer
Motherboard: Chipsets like X570, B650, Z690, or W680
BIOS: Must have Gen4 mode enabled
Many industrial servers already support Gen4, including models like the Dell PowerEdge R7525 and Supermicro 4124GS-TNR. For new designs, Gen4 readiness is becoming standard.
PCIe NVMe SSDs use the high-speed PCIe bus and the NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express) protocol, designed specifically for flash storage. Compared to older SATA SSDs, NVMe delivers much lower latency and higher IOPS.
These SSDs come in several form factors:
M.2 2280: Most common in laptops and embedded systems
U.2: Popular in enterprise servers for hot-swap support
AIC (Add-in Card): Used in workstations and high-performance servers
Whether Gen3 or Gen4, NVMe SSDs offer a major leap over SATA. But only Gen4 can fully utilize the latest high-speed NAND and controllers without bottlenecking.
The choice between Gen3 and Gen4 should be driven by your actual use case, not just peak specs.
Choose Gen4 if you need:
High-speed data logging (e.g., machine vision, radar)
Fast AI/ML model loading in edge computing
Maximum throughput in server or data-intensive applications
Stick with Gen3 if you value:
Lower power and heat in compact or sealed systems
Cost efficiency and long-term supply stability
Compatibility with existing industrial platforms
For example, a traffic monitoring system may benefit from Gen4 during peak video capture, but a remote sensor node running on solar power works better with a reliable, low-power Gen3 SSD.
While Gen4 is the future, Gen3 remains highly relevant—especially in industrial markets.
Gen3 SSDs are generally less expensive, with stable supply chains and long product lifecycles. Many industrial motherboards still only support Gen3, making it the practical choice for long-term deployments.
Endurance (measured in TBW) depends more on NAND quality and firmware than PCIe generation. Both Gen3 and Gen4 industrial SSDs can offer high durability with features like ECC, wear leveling, and bad block management.
PCIe Gen4 SSDs offer real performance gains—especially for data-heavy, high-throughput applications. But in industrial and embedded systems, performance must be balanced with power, heat, cost, and reliability.
Gen3 is not obsolete. It remains a solid, efficient, and cost-effective solution for many real-world applications. Gen4 is ideal when you truly need the bandwidth.
The smart approach? Choose the right tool for the job. Whether you’re designing a new system or upgrading an existing one, base your decision on actual workload demands—not just the latest spec sheet.